WHO INFLUENCED GEORGE SOROS & WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN TO HUMANITY.
Professor Dante Germino’s essay, “Karl Popper’s Open Society,” published in The Political Science Reviewer, Volume 8, Number 1, Fall, 1978.
Interestingly, this publication is published by the Intercollegiate Institute, a conservative group. Germino, who served as a professor of government and foreign affairs at the University of Virginia, was the author of "Political Philosophy and the Open Society."
This important essay makes the following points:
Popper was a young Marxist.
He opposed organized religion, including Judaism and Christianity, which he considered examples of “closed” thinking. He thought “institutional Christianity” such as the “Church of the Popes” had totalitarian impulses.
He advocated a “protectionist” theory of justice to protect the "weak" from the strong on the national and even global levels, even being open to the concept of a world government.
(USING THIS "PROTECTION" AND "THE COMMON GOOD" to pretext power grabs, and once the power is grabbed,it remains in the hands of THE FEW.)
Popper recognized the “sincerity” of Marx, noting his “open-mindedness, his sense of facts, his distrust of verbiage…” and his “burning desire to help the oppressed.”
(MORE DECEPTION DESIGNED TO LURE IN THE DO-GOODERS--BY THE TIME THEY REALIZE WHAT THEY HAVE DONE, IT IS TOO LATE)
Popper attacked Marx because of his belief in “historical determinism” and “philosophy of history,” which held that communism would follow from “the dialectic” struggle of opposing forces.
(MORE DECEPTION. COMMUNISM IS COMMUNISM WHETHER TROTSKY,LENIN,STALIN,MAO OR POL POT...IT ALL ENDS UP THE SAME,SLAUGHTERING THE PEOPLE DOWN TO A MANAGEABLE SIZE OVER WHICH ABSOLUTE UNDISPUTED DOMINANCE CAN BE ASSERTED.)
Popper, in his book, The Open Society and its Enemies, Volume 2, explicitly endorses the Keynesian theory “in favor of government intervention in the economy…”
INTERVENTION - ABSOLUTE CONTROL AS IN WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU CAN NOT BE A SLAVE ANY LONGER--OR WHEN THE ELITES DECIDE--NOT WHEN GOD DECIDES.
Popper favored “piecemeal social engineering,” rather than utopian or “holistic” government intervention.
EUGENICS,GENOCIDE,PERSECUTION,MURDER
Professor Dante Germino goes on to say:
It should be emphasized that, although he expresses concern about the dangers of dramatically increasing governmental power through an activist interventionist policy, Popper is totally confident that the ‘dangers’ can be ‘mastered’ by ‘social technology’ and ‘social piecemeal engineering.’
TECHNOLOGY REPLACES GOD THE CREATOR IN THE SCHEME OF THINGS AND ISN'T IT FLATTERING FOR A TECHNOCAT TO BELIEVE THEY HAVE REPLACED GOD
Germino concludes that Popper is more of a secular liberal in outlook. He also states:
Karl Popper claims to be open, but in his writing he is closed to most of reality outside the world of the pragmatic, secular-liberal humanist…
OUT OF TOUCH WITH MANKIND AND WITH GOD
THIS CAN BE CONSIDERED A PSYCHOSIS
He is closed, for example, “to revelation as the self-disclosure of the divine through the ‘flash of eternity into time’…” Hence, Popper rejects the authority of the New and Old Testaments and the possibility that God has intervened in human affairs through the figure of Jesus Christ and has a plan that is unfolding in human history.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO REJECT JESUS OUTRIGHT, IT'S JUST THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENT INTERPRETATION OF WHO HE WAS. AND MANY SAY WHO HE STILL IS.
SOME SAY HE IS A CONCEPT CREATED BY SHAUL/PAUL.
WHOEVER HE WAS,MUCH WAS DONE IN HIS NAME.
It is interesting and significant that Professor Germino also wrote the book, Antonio Gramsci: Architect of a New Politics, about the Italian communist.
NOTICE GRAMSCI'S UNCANNY RESEMBLANCE TO TROTSKY
Professor Dante Germino’s essay, “Karl Popper’s Open Society,” published in The Political Science Reviewer, Volume 8, Number 1, Fall, 1978.
Interestingly, this publication is published by the Intercollegiate Institute, a conservative group. Germino, who served as a professor of government and foreign affairs at the University of Virginia, was the author of "Political Philosophy and the Open Society."
This important essay makes the following points:
Popper was a young Marxist.
He opposed organized religion, including Judaism and Christianity, which he considered examples of “closed” thinking. He thought “institutional Christianity” such as the “Church of the Popes” had totalitarian impulses.
He advocated a “protectionist” theory of justice to protect the "weak" from the strong on the national and even global levels, even being open to the concept of a world government.
(USING THIS "PROTECTION" AND "THE COMMON GOOD" to pretext power grabs, and once the power is grabbed,it remains in the hands of THE FEW.)
Popper recognized the “sincerity” of Marx, noting his “open-mindedness, his sense of facts, his distrust of verbiage…” and his “burning desire to help the oppressed.”
(MORE DECEPTION DESIGNED TO LURE IN THE DO-GOODERS--BY THE TIME THEY REALIZE WHAT THEY HAVE DONE, IT IS TOO LATE)
Popper attacked Marx because of his belief in “historical determinism” and “philosophy of history,” which held that communism would follow from “the dialectic” struggle of opposing forces.
(MORE DECEPTION. COMMUNISM IS COMMUNISM WHETHER TROTSKY,LENIN,STALIN,MAO OR POL POT...IT ALL ENDS UP THE SAME,SLAUGHTERING THE PEOPLE DOWN TO A MANAGEABLE SIZE OVER WHICH ABSOLUTE UNDISPUTED DOMINANCE CAN BE ASSERTED.)
Popper, in his book, The Open Society and its Enemies, Volume 2, explicitly endorses the Keynesian theory “in favor of government intervention in the economy…”
INTERVENTION - ABSOLUTE CONTROL AS IN WHEN YOU DIE WHEN YOU CAN NOT BE A SLAVE ANY LONGER--OR WHEN THE ELITES DECIDE--NOT WHEN GOD DECIDES.
Popper favored “piecemeal social engineering,” rather than utopian or “holistic” government intervention.
EUGENICS,GENOCIDE,PERSECUTION,MURDER
Professor Dante Germino goes on to say:
It should be emphasized that, although he expresses concern about the dangers of dramatically increasing governmental power through an activist interventionist policy, Popper is totally confident that the ‘dangers’ can be ‘mastered’ by ‘social technology’ and ‘social piecemeal engineering.’
TECHNOLOGY REPLACES GOD THE CREATOR IN THE SCHEME OF THINGS AND ISN'T IT FLATTERING FOR A TECHNOCAT TO BELIEVE THEY HAVE REPLACED GOD
Germino concludes that Popper is more of a secular liberal in outlook. He also states:
Karl Popper claims to be open, but in his writing he is closed to most of reality outside the world of the pragmatic, secular-liberal humanist…
OUT OF TOUCH WITH MANKIND AND WITH GOD
THIS CAN BE CONSIDERED A PSYCHOSIS
He is closed, for example, “to revelation as the self-disclosure of the divine through the ‘flash of eternity into time’…” Hence, Popper rejects the authority of the New and Old Testaments and the possibility that God has intervened in human affairs through the figure of Jesus Christ and has a plan that is unfolding in human history.
IT IS DIFFICULT TO REJECT JESUS OUTRIGHT, IT'S JUST THAT THERE IS A DIFFERENT INTERPRETATION OF WHO HE WAS. AND MANY SAY WHO HE STILL IS.
SOME SAY HE IS A CONCEPT CREATED BY SHAUL/PAUL.
WHOEVER HE WAS,MUCH WAS DONE IN HIS NAME.
It is interesting and significant that Professor Germino also wrote the book, Antonio Gramsci: Architect of a New Politics, about the Italian communist.
NOTICE GRAMSCI'S UNCANNY RESEMBLANCE TO TROTSKY