More on the Atlanta Freeway "Fire"
(Why would anyone want to blow it up?)
By JIM STONE
The CNN report referenced above is HERE
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/31/us/atlanta-interstate-85-fire-collapse/index.html
And the fire test rating procedure and failure rating quoted was the standard government issued ASTM E119 standard fire test. GOOD LUCK ARGUING WITH THAT, DEAR CIA, BECAUSE I NOW BELIEVE YOU DID THIS.
It is important to note the guidelines for the ASTM test. That is: with fire raging under the entire length of a concrete slab, the top of the concrete (the unexposed surface,) at the length of time stated, the temperature of the top of the concrete will not go above 325 farenheit. That's what? A thousand degrees below failure temp after 4 hours on the lowest grade concrete 7 inches thick, with the high grade stuff not going over that temperature at a little over 5 inches thick, with 2,000 degrees on the other side of it for two hours? And the interstate, with 24 inch thick concrete everywhere, bit the dust with about 20 minutes of feeble flame, another 20 minutes of strong flame and about 8 minutes RAGING of flame that would actually match the ASTM test? GIVE ME A BREAK, the interstate was blown NO IFS OR BUTS. Maybe Trump was questioning the 911 collapses, so they had to stage another example! All the while TRUMP HAS GOT TO KNOW THAT ASTM CODE IF HE IS IN CONSTRUCTION. Yeah, when there is an agenda magic happens!
Red Mercury and the Atlanta blast (I'll call it that, because ASTM E119 says so)
TO GET IT OVER QUICK, RED MERCURY WAS A HOAX USED TO SCAM ARABS OUT OF MONEY A LONG TIME AGO.
15 years ago, "Red Mercury" was not a substance, it was a bomb design,what changed?
I had heard about Red Mercury in Atlanta BEFORE this fake initiated interstate collapse happened. Red Mercury is now supposedly a substance (but my past info said it was in fact a design type code named red mercury) for a jump-straight-to fusion nuclear device that had no fissionable core. Supposedly in it's original form, "Red Mercury" was a Russian bomb design that could initiate a hydrogen bomb blast with no nuclear pit. But now it is a substance (I guess) and when I heard people calling it a substance I totally blew it off because I knew what Red Mercury was supposed to be over a decade ago and figured some fruits came up with a new story. That's why I did not mention it.
But now that this incident in Atlanta happened, people are hopping on the "Red Mercury is a substance" bandwagon so I have to mention it.
My fixed and never to be varied statement: Red Mercury is a nuclear weapon type/design that is fusion only. It is not a substance. It was a Russian myth used to scam arabs that I heard about 15 or more years ago. Maybe there is a pure fusion bomb out there, but I sort of doubt it. One other thing about the Red Mercury design was that it was claimed to be a port nuke (one you could sneak through a normal port) because without a fissionable core, it would not alert a neutrino detector. It was billed as a nuke design that could be smuggled. And the Arabs just lapped it up, because they would have no other way to get it to a usable location other than smuggling. Evidently they paid a fair piece for it and it ended up being a ruse.
If you have a different version of the Red Mercury story, it is most likely a simple fabrication. And now it has re-emerged as a substance that makes micro nukes possible and not a bomb type or design? Well, I find it interesting it was mentioned in Atlanta before this incident was caused but I seriously doubt it had anything to do with it OTHER THAN AS A LAUGHABLE EASILY DEBUNKED PSY OP TO LEAD PEOPLE DOWN A DIRT ROAD AND OFF A CLIFF TO STOP THEM FROM LOOKING INTO SOMETHING ELSE, YOU KNOW, THE OBVIOUSLY BLOWN UP INTERSTATE. Better to have people talk about something stupid that anyone in the know heard about a LONG time ago in a totally different context than have anyone looking into why that interstate really collapsed.
My final conclusion: Perhaps the Russians have a pure fusion nuke they never talked about, but you can sure as hell bet that if they do, they did not hand it to Arabs! And if you have heard anything else about red mercury, it was pulled from thin air, perhaps hatched as a psy op, and then spread by people who did not know the original story, which had a thread of truth to it but amounted to a way to bilk money out of Arabs.
How Red Mercury would work if it was real:
Deuterium is compressed and put in a small chamber at about 200 PSI and 3 cubic inches. In the form of a gun nuke with no fissionable material, this chamber would be in the square part, at the bottom. A tungsten or other super hard and heavy material with a very high melting point would be the projectile. It would be very fast, 10,000 feet per second minimum. The barrel it goes down is a vaccum, purged of all air. One side of the pressurized chamber containing deuterium is a thin strong membrane that is easily punctured. This connects to the gun barrel that is a complete vacuum. The end of the projectile that gets fired at it is a flat surface with a large number of sharp fine points sticking out of it like very short needles. This is what first punctures the membrane. At the exact moment the membrane is punctured, the tungsten projectile makes contact with an electrical source of several hundred thousand volts, that can deliver a pulse of at least a thousand amps. This arcs through the deuterium and more than just ionizes it, it is pure nuclear plasma at well over a million degrees. As the voltage source is discharged through it in less than a microsecond, the momentum from the tungsten projectile keeps the pressure on it long enough for a significant fusion reaction to occur.
That's basically the type of thing red mercury tried to accomplish.
Obviously if that could work, the Arabs failed to do it.
Hopefully that kills the "red mercury is a substance" myth. It is a design, that is close to what I said above.
(Why would anyone want to blow it up?)
By JIM STONE
The CNN report referenced above is HERE
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/03/31/us/atlanta-interstate-85-fire-collapse/index.html
And the fire test rating procedure and failure rating quoted was the standard government issued ASTM E119 standard fire test. GOOD LUCK ARGUING WITH THAT, DEAR CIA, BECAUSE I NOW BELIEVE YOU DID THIS.
It is important to note the guidelines for the ASTM test. That is: with fire raging under the entire length of a concrete slab, the top of the concrete (the unexposed surface,) at the length of time stated, the temperature of the top of the concrete will not go above 325 farenheit. That's what? A thousand degrees below failure temp after 4 hours on the lowest grade concrete 7 inches thick, with the high grade stuff not going over that temperature at a little over 5 inches thick, with 2,000 degrees on the other side of it for two hours? And the interstate, with 24 inch thick concrete everywhere, bit the dust with about 20 minutes of feeble flame, another 20 minutes of strong flame and about 8 minutes RAGING of flame that would actually match the ASTM test? GIVE ME A BREAK, the interstate was blown NO IFS OR BUTS. Maybe Trump was questioning the 911 collapses, so they had to stage another example! All the while TRUMP HAS GOT TO KNOW THAT ASTM CODE IF HE IS IN CONSTRUCTION. Yeah, when there is an agenda magic happens!
Red Mercury and the Atlanta blast (I'll call it that, because ASTM E119 says so)
TO GET IT OVER QUICK, RED MERCURY WAS A HOAX USED TO SCAM ARABS OUT OF MONEY A LONG TIME AGO.
15 years ago, "Red Mercury" was not a substance, it was a bomb design,what changed?
I had heard about Red Mercury in Atlanta BEFORE this fake initiated interstate collapse happened. Red Mercury is now supposedly a substance (but my past info said it was in fact a design type code named red mercury) for a jump-straight-to fusion nuclear device that had no fissionable core. Supposedly in it's original form, "Red Mercury" was a Russian bomb design that could initiate a hydrogen bomb blast with no nuclear pit. But now it is a substance (I guess) and when I heard people calling it a substance I totally blew it off because I knew what Red Mercury was supposed to be over a decade ago and figured some fruits came up with a new story. That's why I did not mention it.
But now that this incident in Atlanta happened, people are hopping on the "Red Mercury is a substance" bandwagon so I have to mention it.
My fixed and never to be varied statement: Red Mercury is a nuclear weapon type/design that is fusion only. It is not a substance. It was a Russian myth used to scam arabs that I heard about 15 or more years ago. Maybe there is a pure fusion bomb out there, but I sort of doubt it. One other thing about the Red Mercury design was that it was claimed to be a port nuke (one you could sneak through a normal port) because without a fissionable core, it would not alert a neutrino detector. It was billed as a nuke design that could be smuggled. And the Arabs just lapped it up, because they would have no other way to get it to a usable location other than smuggling. Evidently they paid a fair piece for it and it ended up being a ruse.
If you have a different version of the Red Mercury story, it is most likely a simple fabrication. And now it has re-emerged as a substance that makes micro nukes possible and not a bomb type or design? Well, I find it interesting it was mentioned in Atlanta before this incident was caused but I seriously doubt it had anything to do with it OTHER THAN AS A LAUGHABLE EASILY DEBUNKED PSY OP TO LEAD PEOPLE DOWN A DIRT ROAD AND OFF A CLIFF TO STOP THEM FROM LOOKING INTO SOMETHING ELSE, YOU KNOW, THE OBVIOUSLY BLOWN UP INTERSTATE. Better to have people talk about something stupid that anyone in the know heard about a LONG time ago in a totally different context than have anyone looking into why that interstate really collapsed.
My final conclusion: Perhaps the Russians have a pure fusion nuke they never talked about, but you can sure as hell bet that if they do, they did not hand it to Arabs! And if you have heard anything else about red mercury, it was pulled from thin air, perhaps hatched as a psy op, and then spread by people who did not know the original story, which had a thread of truth to it but amounted to a way to bilk money out of Arabs.
How Red Mercury would work if it was real:
Deuterium is compressed and put in a small chamber at about 200 PSI and 3 cubic inches. In the form of a gun nuke with no fissionable material, this chamber would be in the square part, at the bottom. A tungsten or other super hard and heavy material with a very high melting point would be the projectile. It would be very fast, 10,000 feet per second minimum. The barrel it goes down is a vaccum, purged of all air. One side of the pressurized chamber containing deuterium is a thin strong membrane that is easily punctured. This connects to the gun barrel that is a complete vacuum. The end of the projectile that gets fired at it is a flat surface with a large number of sharp fine points sticking out of it like very short needles. This is what first punctures the membrane. At the exact moment the membrane is punctured, the tungsten projectile makes contact with an electrical source of several hundred thousand volts, that can deliver a pulse of at least a thousand amps. This arcs through the deuterium and more than just ionizes it, it is pure nuclear plasma at well over a million degrees. As the voltage source is discharged through it in less than a microsecond, the momentum from the tungsten projectile keeps the pressure on it long enough for a significant fusion reaction to occur.
That's basically the type of thing red mercury tried to accomplish.
Obviously if that could work, the Arabs failed to do it.
Hopefully that kills the "red mercury is a substance" myth. It is a design, that is close to what I said above.