Glyphosate update
by JIM STONE
IMPORTANT: This report is getting attacked, and somehow, for some people when it goes across the web, "g.l.y.p.h.o.s.a.t.e" is getting AI ( Bot)- changed to "glyphosphate" to undermine the report's credibility. No where is it spelled "glyphosphate" in this report.
AI is apparently seeding tons of errors into this report that I can't fix, because it is correctly done with no errors on this page.
SINCE THIS REPORT IS APPARENTLY SO IMPORTANT I AM GOING TO GO INTO DETAIL ON A FEW THINGS.
Most readers have seen the original report by now because I had it top posted all weekend. If you have not seen it, scroll down to the headline "Is Glyphosate killing the oceans? The probability cannot be denied". And now I will go into detail on key things people are asking about.
1. Fukushima: Fukushima is obviously a big problem. However, Fukushima cannot be what is killing the Carribbean, the Atlantic, the South Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and other oceans. Due to ocean currents Fukushima is North Pacific only. It cannot contaminate the south pacific in our lifetimes because the ocean systems do not substantially mix north and south of the equator. They obviously mix a little, but not a lot. There is a current barrier there, due to the earth's rotation. If the oceans are dying everywhere, it cannot be Fukushima causing it.
2. Though over fishing is a huge problem, over fishing won't kill off the coral, barnacles, sea sponges, starfish and other species on a reef, and won't render huge sections of reef dead. New reefs pop up everywhere, even on oil rigs, and that is stopping now. Reefs do not need pristine environments to thrive. An oil rig or old shipwreck will get a reef on it quickly. Yet something is killing the oceans unilaterally - everywhere, in all situations.
3. It is not global warming or the use of fuels that is triggering phytoplankton die offs. There are a few carbon tax scammers, including the New York Times that are claiming it is high Co2 levels triggering the die offs. But since Co2 is plant food, the phytoplankton that form the basis of the food chain that are dying off now should instead be exploding in population with more Co2 and there should be more life in the oceans now than there ever was. In large industrial scale greenhouses, they typically try to get the Co2 levels approximately 3 times as high as normal atmospheric Co2 by artificially adding it to the air because that's the sweet spot where everything grows like crazy. There is no way a slight rise in Co2 levels produced by man, that add only few percent to the total atmospheric level would trigger anything bad when it is well proven plants like Co2 levels to be hundreds of percent higher than natural levels. Whatever is killing the phytoplankton is not a little extra Co2, and not any sort of "ocean acidification due to Co2" scam the carbon taxers are pushing.
4. I believe glyphosate killing the oceans was part of a plan since Monsanto introduced it. There is no conceivable way they did not know that the ocean would permanently retain it, once it made it to the ocean. More importantly, Monsanto's claims that glyphosate de-activates in soil are also partially fraudulent, because though it is true it stops killing plants once it binds with soil, all it takes to un-bind it with soil is erosion, and having it wash into a waterway. Once in fresh water it will reduce in strength by 50 percent over 90 days, but even the Mississippi river, which is a long trek to the ocean, makes the entire trip from the headwaters in Minnesota to the gulf of Mexico in less than half that time. Once in the ocean, the alkaline environment produced by the salts in the ocean, - cause glyphosate which is also a salt - to stay active indefinitely. So once it gets in the ocean, it keeps building up year after year. That is a dead end with catastrophe, once you get that situation it is only a matter of time before you reach the end of life in the sea. And worse yet is the fact that in alkaline environments, the power of glyphosate is boosted dramatically. A little does a lot more damage.
5. I believe that even if Monsanto knew for certain their product was killing the oceans, AND that if the New World Order crowd knew glyphosate was killing the oceans, including the likes of the Rothchilds, Rockefeller, Soros, and their entire Family's community, that nothing would be done to stop it because glyphosate is one of the key supporting points for GMO crops, and they want GMO at all cost. The entire selling point for GMO is that it is glyphosate resistant, so farmers can REALLY kill the weeds by spraying glyphosate like a hurricane. Get rid of GMOs, and it makes no sense to do that. Get rid of glyphosate, and there is no reason for GMOs, which don't produce any better than natural hybrids. The entire marketing point for both is killing weeds, and bringing in a clean crop at the end of the year. That is all it boils down to from the farmer's perspective, but from the NWO perspective there are obviously things more sinister.
6. Pet agendas are going to bury the truth. Even if it is not glyphosate killing the ocean, many evil people have pet agendas that are going to prevent the truth from being discovered.
Pet Agenda 1: Man made global warming and the carbon tax. These people got outed on the warming part, but if they can front an entirely new scam and say the increased Co2 is acidifying the oceans and triggering die offs, and that gets them cash from a scam carbon tax, they'll never let go of that, no matter what they personally know the truth is.
Pet agenda 2: Fukushima - This is not really a big one, because it seems only a few people in alt media have this as an agenda. It gets them clicks to say Fukushima is killing everything everywhere, but it is utter nonsense when the die offs are happening in oceans that are not even associated with Fukushima.
Pet agenda 3: Genetically modified crops. Even if the people pushing these crops and glyphosate knew they were killing the oceans, they would not care. Their end goal is a patent on everything, including the food you eat. If they can wipe out a competing food source - the ocean - they'd be happy with that, and you can bet your life that is the case. To hell with the whales and the reefs and the cute little fishies, if they are gone and everything everyone eats is therefore sourced from something these people have a patent on, all the better for them, because they will own the world. Who cares if it is half dead?
by JIM STONE
IMPORTANT: This report is getting attacked, and somehow, for some people when it goes across the web, "g.l.y.p.h.o.s.a.t.e" is getting AI ( Bot)- changed to "glyphosphate" to undermine the report's credibility. No where is it spelled "glyphosphate" in this report.
AI is apparently seeding tons of errors into this report that I can't fix, because it is correctly done with no errors on this page.
SINCE THIS REPORT IS APPARENTLY SO IMPORTANT I AM GOING TO GO INTO DETAIL ON A FEW THINGS.
Most readers have seen the original report by now because I had it top posted all weekend. If you have not seen it, scroll down to the headline "Is Glyphosate killing the oceans? The probability cannot be denied". And now I will go into detail on key things people are asking about.
1. Fukushima: Fukushima is obviously a big problem. However, Fukushima cannot be what is killing the Carribbean, the Atlantic, the South Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and other oceans. Due to ocean currents Fukushima is North Pacific only. It cannot contaminate the south pacific in our lifetimes because the ocean systems do not substantially mix north and south of the equator. They obviously mix a little, but not a lot. There is a current barrier there, due to the earth's rotation. If the oceans are dying everywhere, it cannot be Fukushima causing it.
2. Though over fishing is a huge problem, over fishing won't kill off the coral, barnacles, sea sponges, starfish and other species on a reef, and won't render huge sections of reef dead. New reefs pop up everywhere, even on oil rigs, and that is stopping now. Reefs do not need pristine environments to thrive. An oil rig or old shipwreck will get a reef on it quickly. Yet something is killing the oceans unilaterally - everywhere, in all situations.
3. It is not global warming or the use of fuels that is triggering phytoplankton die offs. There are a few carbon tax scammers, including the New York Times that are claiming it is high Co2 levels triggering the die offs. But since Co2 is plant food, the phytoplankton that form the basis of the food chain that are dying off now should instead be exploding in population with more Co2 and there should be more life in the oceans now than there ever was. In large industrial scale greenhouses, they typically try to get the Co2 levels approximately 3 times as high as normal atmospheric Co2 by artificially adding it to the air because that's the sweet spot where everything grows like crazy. There is no way a slight rise in Co2 levels produced by man, that add only few percent to the total atmospheric level would trigger anything bad when it is well proven plants like Co2 levels to be hundreds of percent higher than natural levels. Whatever is killing the phytoplankton is not a little extra Co2, and not any sort of "ocean acidification due to Co2" scam the carbon taxers are pushing.
4. I believe glyphosate killing the oceans was part of a plan since Monsanto introduced it. There is no conceivable way they did not know that the ocean would permanently retain it, once it made it to the ocean. More importantly, Monsanto's claims that glyphosate de-activates in soil are also partially fraudulent, because though it is true it stops killing plants once it binds with soil, all it takes to un-bind it with soil is erosion, and having it wash into a waterway. Once in fresh water it will reduce in strength by 50 percent over 90 days, but even the Mississippi river, which is a long trek to the ocean, makes the entire trip from the headwaters in Minnesota to the gulf of Mexico in less than half that time. Once in the ocean, the alkaline environment produced by the salts in the ocean, - cause glyphosate which is also a salt - to stay active indefinitely. So once it gets in the ocean, it keeps building up year after year. That is a dead end with catastrophe, once you get that situation it is only a matter of time before you reach the end of life in the sea. And worse yet is the fact that in alkaline environments, the power of glyphosate is boosted dramatically. A little does a lot more damage.
5. I believe that even if Monsanto knew for certain their product was killing the oceans, AND that if the New World Order crowd knew glyphosate was killing the oceans, including the likes of the Rothchilds, Rockefeller, Soros, and their entire Family's community, that nothing would be done to stop it because glyphosate is one of the key supporting points for GMO crops, and they want GMO at all cost. The entire selling point for GMO is that it is glyphosate resistant, so farmers can REALLY kill the weeds by spraying glyphosate like a hurricane. Get rid of GMOs, and it makes no sense to do that. Get rid of glyphosate, and there is no reason for GMOs, which don't produce any better than natural hybrids. The entire marketing point for both is killing weeds, and bringing in a clean crop at the end of the year. That is all it boils down to from the farmer's perspective, but from the NWO perspective there are obviously things more sinister.
6. Pet agendas are going to bury the truth. Even if it is not glyphosate killing the ocean, many evil people have pet agendas that are going to prevent the truth from being discovered.
Pet Agenda 1: Man made global warming and the carbon tax. These people got outed on the warming part, but if they can front an entirely new scam and say the increased Co2 is acidifying the oceans and triggering die offs, and that gets them cash from a scam carbon tax, they'll never let go of that, no matter what they personally know the truth is.
Pet agenda 2: Fukushima - This is not really a big one, because it seems only a few people in alt media have this as an agenda. It gets them clicks to say Fukushima is killing everything everywhere, but it is utter nonsense when the die offs are happening in oceans that are not even associated with Fukushima.
Pet agenda 3: Genetically modified crops. Even if the people pushing these crops and glyphosate knew they were killing the oceans, they would not care. Their end goal is a patent on everything, including the food you eat. If they can wipe out a competing food source - the ocean - they'd be happy with that, and you can bet your life that is the case. To hell with the whales and the reefs and the cute little fishies, if they are gone and everything everyone eats is therefore sourced from something these people have a patent on, all the better for them, because they will own the world. Who cares if it is half dead?